Wilding Pines & Carbon
Wilding conifers are one of the most contentious issues in New Zealand’s carbon farming landscape. They store carbon, but their spread threatens native ecosystems. Understanding this tension is essential for responsible carbon farming.
What Are Wilding Pines?
Definition
Wilding conifers (commonly called “wilding pines”) are self-seeded exotic conifer trees growing where they’re not wanted. They spread from:
- Existing plantations
- Shelterbelts
- Amenity plantings
- Other wilding populations
The Scale of the Problem
- 1.7-1.8 million hectares currently affected in NZ
- 5% annual expansion rate predicted without intervention
- High country, tussock lands, and native ecosystems most at risk
- $24+ million/year spent on control operations
Most Problematic Species
| Species | Risk Level | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Pinus contorta (Lodgepole pine) | Very high | Declared “unwanted organism” in 2010 |
| Douglas-fir | High | Spreads aggressively in some conditions |
| Corsican pine | High | Prolific seeder |
| Radiata pine | Moderate | Less aggressive but still spreads |
| Larch | Moderate | Particular locations |
The Carbon-Environment Tension
The Carbon Argument
Wilding pines undeniably store carbon:
- They’re growing trees, sequestering CO₂
- In some locations, they’ve been registered in the ETS
- Removing them releases stored carbon
- Pines earn 2-3x more carbon credits than native forest under current tables
The Environmental Argument
But wildings cause significant environmental harm:
- Displace native ecosystems — tussock, alpine, wetland
- Reduce biodiversity — shade out native species
- Alter water systems — increase evapotranspiration
- Change fire risk — highly flammable in some conditions
- Spread uncontrollably — seeds travel kilometres
The Policy Tension
This creates genuine policy conflict:
- Climate goals favour more trees
- Biodiversity goals favour removing wildings
- Individual landowners may have different incentives than the public interest
Wildings and the ETS
Can Wildings Be Registered?
Technically, naturally regenerating forest (including wildings) can be registered in the ETS if it meets forest definitions. However:
- Internationally, wilding conifers generally can’t be entered into emissions trading schemes
- Additionality questions — would the wildings exist without carbon credits?
- Permanence issues — control programmes may remove them
- Perverse outcomes — registration could incentivise spread
The Deforestation Liability Problem
Here’s a real challenge: if you have wilding pines that meet forest definitions and you remove them, you may face deforestation liability.
Case example: One landowner found they could face $3 million in deforestation penalties for removing wilding pines that had spread onto their land. The cost of surrendering carbon credits would exceed their control budget.
Current Rules
The ETS doesn’t specifically address wildings, creating grey areas:
- Technically eligible if meeting forest definitions
- But environmental policy discourages registration
- Control programmes may create liability
- No clear exemption for wilding removal
National Wilding Conifer Control
The National Programme
The National Wilding Conifer Control Programme was established in 2016:
- Partnership between central government, local government, farmers, and foresters
- Aims to implement the National Wilding Conifer Management Strategy 2015-2030
- Approximately $24 million/year invested
- 470,000 hectares of control operations delivered
Control Methods
- Ground-based cutting and poisoning
- Aerial herbicide application
- Targeted removal of seed sources
- Preventing further spread
Impact on Carbon Farming
Implications for Plantation Forestry
If you establish plantation forestry:
- You may be responsible for wilding spread from your forest
- National Environmental Standards for Commercial Forestry (NES-CF) from 2023 include wilding management rules
- Neighbours and councils may require wilding control
- Costs can be significant — ongoing management obligation
Species Choice Matters
Some species are higher risk:
- Avoid high-spreading species near sensitive environments
- Consider sterile or low-fertility options where available
- Site selection affects spread risk
- Shelterbelts and edges are high-risk zones
Registration Considerations
Before registering naturally regenerating exotic forest:
- Is it actually wilding spread?
- What are the environmental implications?
- Could control requirements create future liability?
- Is native regeneration a better option?
Creative Solutions
The “Line in the Sand” Approach
Some landowners have found innovative solutions:
- Define a core area of existing trees
- Register that core area in the ETS
- Use carbon income to fund control of outlying wildings
- Prevent further spread while retaining core forest
This balances:
- Carbon income from existing forest
- Environmental responsibility for controlling spread
- Practical management of a difficult situation
Native Transition
Another approach:
- Use wilding areas as nurse crops for native regeneration
- Gradually transition to native forest over time
- Eventually shift ETS registration to native
- Achieves both carbon and biodiversity outcomes
Responsibilities
Landowner Obligations
Under the NES-CF and regional rules, you may need to:
- Assess wilding spread risk before planting
- Prepare and implement wilding management plans
- Control wilding spread from your forest
- Report on wilding management
- Bear control costs
Neighbour Relations
Wilding spread affects relationships:
- Neighbours may demand action
- Council may intervene
- Reputational impacts
- Potential legal liability
Regional Variations
High-Risk Areas
Some regions have particular wilding issues:
- Central Plateau — extensive spread
- Mackenzie Basin — iconic landscapes threatened
- High country generally — tussock ecosystems at risk
- Conservation land boundaries — sensitive interfaces
Local Rules
Regional and district plans may include:
- Prohibited planting species
- Required setbacks from boundaries
- Wilding management conditions
- Reporting requirements
Check local rules before planting.
Future Directions
Policy Development
The government is considering:
- Restricting exotic forests from permanent category (to reduce wilding incentives)
- Better integration of carbon and biodiversity objectives
- Clearer rules for wilding-affected land
- Exemptions for wilding control from deforestation liability
Native Focus
Policy is shifting toward:
- Preference for native forestry
- Recognition of biodiversity values
- Reduced support for exotic carbon-only forestry
- Higher standards for environmental management
Practical Guidance
Before Planting
- Assess wilding spread risk for your site
- Choose appropriate species
- Understand regional rules
- Plan for ongoing wilding management
- Consider native alternatives
Managing Existing Wildings
- Determine if registration is appropriate
- Understand liability implications
- Develop management approach
- Engage with control programmes
- Consider transition to native
If You Have ETS Wildings
- Assess environmental impact
- Consider creative solutions
- Plan for potential policy changes
- Maintain good neighbour relations
- Document your approach
Key Takeaways
- Wildings are a genuine environmental problem — not just nuisance trees
- Carbon credits create perverse incentives — payments for environmental harm
- Deforestation liability can trap landowners — removal may cost more than control
- Species choice matters enormously — some are much higher risk
- Native forestry avoids the issue — no wilding spread concerns
- Policy is evolving — expect further changes