Native Forestry & Regeneration

Native forest is making a comeback in New Zealand’s carbon landscape. With no LUC restrictions, permanent storage potential, and biodiversity benefits, indigenous forestry offers a compelling pathway for many landowners.

Why Native Forest for Carbon?

No Land Use Restrictions

Unlike exotic forestry, native forests face no restrictions based on Land Use Capability (LUC) class. You can register native regeneration on any eligible land, including high-quality farmland.

This makes natives the only carbon option for some landowners who want to convert good land to forestry.

Permanent Carbon Storage

Native forests naturally align with the permanent forest category. They store carbon in perpetuity — not just in trees, but in soils and organic matter that’s currently not counted in ETS calculations.

Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services

Beyond carbon, native forests provide:

These “co-benefits” are increasingly valued, even if not directly monetised in the ETS.

Types of Native Carbon Forestry

Natural Regeneration

The simplest and cheapest approach — let native bush come back naturally.

How it works:

Typical succession:

  1. Pioneers colonise (gorse, broom, or native shrubs)
  2. Early natives establish (kanuka, manuka, mahoe)
  3. Canopy closes, suppressing weeds
  4. Later successional species arrive (rimu, matai, kahikatea)

Cost: Very low (mainly pest control and fencing) Speed: Slow — 5-15 years to meet forest definition Carbon: Lower early earnings, sustained long-term

Planted Native Forest

Active establishment with nursery-raised plants.

How it works:

Typical species:

Cost: Higher ($5,000-15,000+/ha depending on species and site) Speed: Faster establishment than natural regeneration Carbon: Earlier onset of sequestration

Transitional/Nurse Crop Approach

Using exotic or weed species to nurse native establishment.

How it works:

Common scenarios:

Carbon: Can earn credits from establishment, with long-term native outcome

Carbon Earnings from Natives

The Lookup Table Situation

Currently, all native species use a single national lookup table. This averages across all indigenous types and doesn’t distinguish between fast and slow-growing natives.

Key figures:

The limitation: Fast-growing natives like kanuka earn the same per-hectare as slow-growing podocarp. There’s no incentive in the current system for choosing faster-growing indigenous species.

The opportunity: MPI is reviewing lookup tables. Future versions may differentiate between native forest types, potentially rewarding faster-growing species appropriately.

Earnings Example

For 10 hectares of regenerating native bush:

YearCarbon StockNZUs EarnedCumulative
535 t/ha350350
1070 t/ha350700
20140 t/ha7001,400
30200 t/ha6002,000
50280 t/ha8002,800

At $60/NZU, 2,800 units = $168,000 over 50 years (or ~$3,360/year average)

Compare to 10 ha of radiata pine under averaging: ~5,500 units × $60 = $330,000 — but earned in ~16 years.

The native approach earns less, but permanently stores carbon and generates income over decades.

Practical Considerations

Site Preparation

Weed control:

Fencing:

Access:

Pest Control

Pests are the biggest threat to native regeneration:

Possums: Browse native foliage, suppress regeneration Rats: Eat seeds, reducing natural spread Stoats/ferrets: Kill native birds that disperse seeds Deer: Browse palatable species heavily Goats/pigs: Damage understory and roots

A sustained pest control programme is essential for healthy native forest development.

Timeframes

Native forestry requires patience:

StageTimeframe
Initial establishment3-5 years
Forest definition met5-15 years
Canopy closure15-30 years
Mature structure50-100+ years

This isn’t a quick return — it’s a generational commitment.

Financial Support Options

Native Afforestation Grants

Various programmes have supported native planting:

Check current availability — these programmes change frequently.

Community Conservation

Partnerships with conservation organisations can provide:

Hybrid Approaches

Some landowners plant exotics on main carbon areas and use native funding for stream margins, steep slopes, and biodiversity areas — capturing multiple value streams.

Native Forestry and the Permanent Category

Natives and permanent forestry are a natural fit:

Why they align:

Registration approach: Most native forest suits the permanent forest category, earning under stock change accounting without averaging limitations.

Common Native Forestry Questions

”Can I harvest my native forest?”

Limited harvesting may be possible under the permanent category (selective removal). Major harvest of indigenous timber requires permits under the Forests Act.

”Does the forest have to be solid native?”

No. Transitional forests with gorse/broom and emerging natives can be registered. The trajectory toward indigenous forest matters more than current composition.

”What about honey from manuka?”

Compatible. Beekeeping in registered native forest is allowed and can add significant revenue — $500-2,000+/ha/year depending on location and manuka density.

”Can I get QEII covenant and ETS credits?”

Sometimes. If the covenant land includes post-1989 native regeneration, it may be eligible. Many older covenants cover pre-1990 forest and aren’t eligible.


Key Takeaways

  1. No LUC restrictions — natives can go anywhere
  2. Permanent category fits — 50-year commitment aligns with native timeframes
  3. Slower earnings — but sustained over decades
  4. Co-benefits matter — biodiversity, water, culture
  5. Pest control essential — investment required
  6. Patience required — this is generational work

Next Steps

← Back to Learn