Due Diligence for Land Buyers
Buying land that’s registered in the ETS — or that should be — requires careful due diligence. Carbon liabilities can transfer with the land, and failing to understand these obligations before purchase can be costly.
Why This Matters
Carbon liabilities follow the land, not the previous owner. If you buy land registered in the ETS, you automatically inherit:
- The ETS registration and all obligations
- Any existing unit balance (positive or negative)
- Compliance requirements from the date of original registration
- Potential penalties for past non-compliance
There have been cases of buyers discovering after settlement that they have significant carbon liabilities from previous clearing or non-compliance.
Key Checks Before Purchase
1. Certificate of Title
Under section 195 of the Climate Change Response Act, ETS status must be recorded on the land title.
Look for notices indicating:
- Post-1989 forest registration
- Pre-1990 forest classification
- Permanent forest covenants (PFSI or PP89)
- Any forestry-related encumbrances
Important: Even if there’s no notice, the land may still have obligations. Pre-1990 forest status exists regardless of title notation.
2. ETS Registration Status
Confirm with MPI:
- Is the land registered in the ETS?
- Which category (standard, averaging, permanent)?
- What is the current unit balance?
- When were last emissions returns filed?
- Are there any compliance issues?
3. Pre-1990 Forest Assessment
Critical question: Was there forest on this land on 31 December 1989?
If yes, and it’s been cleared, there may be deforestation liability — even if years have passed and no one has enforced it.
Check:
- Historical aerial photographs
- MPI pre-1990 mapping
- Regional council records
- Previous land use records
4. Carbon Liability Calculation
If land has been cleared:
- What was the carbon stock before clearing?
- How many NZUs are owed?
- At current prices, what’s the financial exposure?
Example: 50 hectares of pre-1990 pine forest cleared without compliance could represent liability of $1-2 million or more.
5. Grant Restrictions
Previous owners may have received grants with ETS restrictions:
| Grant Programme | ETS Restriction |
|---|---|
| Afforestation Grant Scheme (AGS) | No ETS registration for 10 years |
| One Billion Trees Fund (1BT) | No pine ETS registration for 6 years |
| Erosion control grants | May have conditions |
If restrictions apply, you cannot register until they expire.
6. Forestry Rights and Leases
If someone else holds a forestry right or lease:
- ETS participation may be with the right-holder
- Carbon rights may be separate from land ownership
- Understand who owns what before purchasing
Transfer Obligations
If you’re buying ETS-registered land:
Seller’s Obligations
The seller should:
- File a transfer of participation form within 20 working days
- Complete an emissions return to transfer date
- Settle any outstanding unit balance
- Notify MPI of the transfer
Buyer’s Obligations
As the buyer, you:
- Automatically become the participant if transfer is registered
- Inherit all obligations from the date of original registration
- Must continue compliance (emissions returns, fees, etc.)
- Become liable for any outstanding units
What If the Seller Doesn’t File?
Even if the seller fails to submit transfer documents, if you buy registered post-1989 land, you automatically inherit the obligations. The law is clear: the new landowner becomes responsible.
Red Flags
Watch out for:
Price Discounts Without Explanation
If land is priced below market, there may be hidden carbon liabilities. A “bargain” could come with millions in obligations.
Cleared Forest with No Documentation
If land shows evidence of recent forest removal but no deforestation compliance documentation, investigate before purchasing.
Lapsed Compliance
If the current owner hasn’t filed emissions returns or paid fees, you may inherit penalties as well as substantive obligations.
Incomplete Title Information
If ETS status isn’t on the title but should be, there may be compliance failures that create risk.
Vendor Reluctance to Provide Information
A legitimate seller should be willing to provide complete information about ETS status and carbon position.
Protecting Yourself
In the Sale Agreement
Include provisions for:
- Warranties about ETS status and compliance
- Disclosure of all carbon-related obligations
- Unit balance adjustment at settlement
- Indemnities for undisclosed liabilities
Professional Advice
Engage:
- Lawyer — experienced with ETS land transfers
- Forestry consultant — to assess forest status and carbon position
- Carbon advisor — to value carbon assets and liabilities
- Surveyor — if boundary/area questions arise
MPI Verification
Contact MPI directly to confirm:
- Registration status
- Participant details
- Unit balances
- Compliance history
Don’t rely solely on the vendor’s statements.
Pre-1990 Forest: Specific Risks
Pre-1990 forest carries particular risks:
Deforestation Liability
If you clear pre-1990 forest (or it’s been cleared), you must surrender NZUs equal to the carbon released. At $60/NZU, this could be $20,000-40,000+ per hectare.
Exemptions May Not Apply
Historical exemptions (like the 50 ha exemption) had application deadlines. You may not be able to claim exemptions the previous owner could have.
No Upside, Only Downside
Pre-1990 forest cannot earn NZUs — only liabilities apply. The only carbon outcome is potential liability if deforested.
Replanting Avoids Liability
If you replant after harvesting pre-1990 forest, there’s no deforestation liability. But if you convert to pasture or other use, full liability applies.
Post-1989 Forest: Considerations
For post-1989 registered forest:
Unit Balance
- Positive balance: Asset (NZUs you own)
- Negative balance: Liability (NZUs you owe)
Settlement should reflect the carbon position.
Averaging vs Stock Change
- Averaging accounting: Simpler, no harvest liability if replanting
- Stock change accounting: Full unit surrender at harvest
Understand which method applies.
Permanent Category
If registered as permanent forest:
- 50-year commitment
- Cannot clear-fell
- Early exit means surrendering all units received
- This is a significant encumbrance
Valuing Carbon in Land Purchases
When assessing purchase price:
Carbon Assets
Post-1989 forests with positive unit balances have value:
- Units in holding account
- Future earning potential to averaging age
- Consider as separate line item in valuation
Carbon Liabilities
Factor in:
- Existing negative balances
- Compliance costs (annual fees, returns)
- Potential future liabilities
Net Position
Carbon-adjusted land value = Base land value + Carbon assets − Carbon liabilities
Settlement Process
At settlement:
Documentation
Ensure you receive:
- ETS registration documentation
- All emissions return history
- Unit holding account access details
- Transfer of participation confirmation
Unit Balance Settlement
Options include:
- Seller transfers units to buyer’s account
- Cash adjustment for unit value
- Seller files final return before transfer
- Contract specifies which approach
MPI Notification
Confirm transfer is properly registered with MPI. Until this happens, obligations may be unclear.
Common Mistakes Buyers Make
- Assuming title tells the whole story — ETS obligations can exist without title notation
- Not verifying with MPI directly — relying on vendor representations
- Ignoring pre-1990 forest status — assuming no forest history
- Undervaluing compliance costs — annual fees, returns, professional costs
- Not adjusting for carbon in price — treating it as separate from land value
- Missing grant restrictions — purchasing then finding ETS registration blocked
Key Takeaways
- Carbon liabilities transfer with land — you inherit what the previous owner had
- Check the title, but don’t stop there — verify with MPI directly
- Pre-1990 forest carries significant risk — clearing liability can be substantial
- Get professional advice — legal, forestry, and carbon expertise
- Include protections in the sale agreement — warranties, disclosures, indemnities
- Adjust price for carbon position — assets and liabilities both have value